
Crossfitwallingford
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date 1919年5月8日
-
Sectors Telecommunications
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 5
Company Description
Generative Artificial Intelligence
Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially large language models (LLMs), allowed an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image synthetic intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu as well as various smaller companies have established generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]
Generative AI has uses throughout a vast array of industries, consisting of software application advancement, health care, financing, home entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] fashion, [18] and product style. [19] However, concerns have been raised about the possible misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, making use of phony news or deepfakes to deceive or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Copyright law concerns likewise exist around generative models that are trained on and imitate copyrighted works of art. [22]
Early history
Since its creation, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the consequences of developing synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these issues have previously been checked out by misconception, fiction and philosophy because antiquity. [23] The concept of automatic art go back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where innovators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were described as having designed makers capable of writing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of imaginative automations has flourished throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton produced in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been utilized to design natural languages since their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and analyzed the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]
Academic expert system
The scholastic discipline of expert system was developed at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced numerous waves of advancement and optimism in the decades since. [31] Expert system research study began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have actually used expert system to produce artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was producing and showing generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen created to create paintings. [32]
The terms generative AI planning or generative planning were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, especially computer-aided procedure preparation, utilized to produce sequences of actions to reach a specified goal. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems used symbolic AI techniques such as state area search and restriction satisfaction and were a “reasonably mature” technology by the early 1990s. They were used to produce crisis action strategies for military usage, [35] process strategies for producing [33] and decision strategies such as in prototype self-governing spacecraft. [36]
Generative neural webs (2014-2019)
Since its inception, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative designs and generative designs, to model and forecast data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep knowing drove development and research study in image category, speech recognition, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this era were generally trained as discriminative designs, due to the problem of generative modeling. [37]
In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks efficient in finding out generative designs, instead of discriminative ones, for intricate information such as images. These deep generative models were the very first to output not only class labels for images however also whole images.
In 2017, the Transformer network made it possible for developments in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] resulting in the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), understood as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the ability to generalize without supervision to many different tasks as a Structure model. [40]
The new generative models presented during this duration enabled big neural networks to be trained using without supervision learning or semi-supervised learning, rather than the monitored learning normal of discriminative designs. Unsupervised learning eliminated the need for human beings to by hand identify information, enabling larger networks to be trained. [41]
Generative AI boom (2020-)
In March 2020, 15. ai, developed by a confidential MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that could create persuading character voices using very little training data. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI technology. [43] [44]
In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to premium artificial intelligence art development from natural language prompts. [46] These systems demonstrated unmatched abilities in generating photorealistic images, art work, and creates based on text descriptions, causing extensive adoption amongst artists, designers, and the public.
In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT reinvented the availability and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s capability to engage in natural discussions, produce imaginative material, help with coding, and perform numerous analytical jobs caught international attention and sparked extensive conversation about AI’s prospective effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]
In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could reasonably be considered as an early (yet still insufficient) variation of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the criteria of ‘basic human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta released ImageBind, an AI design integrating multiple techniques including text, images, video, thermal data, 3D information, audio, and motion, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]
In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI model offered in 4 versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, releasing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]
In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of big language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs demonstrated considerable improvements in abilities across various benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforming leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated improved performance compared to the bigger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]
According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents utilizing the innovation, going beyond both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s intellectual home developments in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]
Modalities
A generative AI system is built by using unsupervised artificial intelligence (invoking for circumstances neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine discovering trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend upon the method or type of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For example, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]
Text
Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language models). They can natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be used as structure designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).
Code
In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on programming language text, enabling them to produce source code for new computer programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]
Images
Producing premium visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly utilized for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).
Audio
Generative AI can also be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which showed the ability to clone character voices using as little as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The site gained extensive attention for its ability to produce mentally meaningful speech for different imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives subsequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]
Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music along with text annotations, in order to create brand-new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a soothing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.
Music
Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been generated, like the song Savages, which used AI to imitate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists must get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]
Many AI music generators have been created that can be created utilizing a text phrase, genre choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]
Video
Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, comprehensive and photorealistic video. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]
Actions
Generative AI can also be trained on the movements of a robotic system to produce new trajectories for motion planning or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “get blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to control motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out simple reasoning in action to user triggers and visual input, such as picking up a toy dinosaur when provided the timely choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other objects. [79]
3D modeling
Artificially smart computer-aided style (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could likewise be developed using connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help streamline workflow. [82]
Software and hardware
Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have actually been integrated into a range of existing commercially offered items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are also readily available as open-source software, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.
Smaller generative AI designs with as much as a few billion parameters can run on smart devices, embedded devices, and personal computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion specifications) can work on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]
Larger designs with tens of billions of specifications can operate on laptop or home computer. To accomplish an acceptable speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion specification variation of LLaMA can be set up to run on a desktop PC. [91]
The advantages of running generative AI locally include protection of personal privacy and intellectual home, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular focuses on utilizing consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That online forum is among just two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model standards. [93] Yann LeCun has actually advocated open-source models for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI safety. [95]
Language designs with hundreds of billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically run on datacenter computer systems geared up with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are usually accessed as cloud services over the Internet.
In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to meet the requirements of the sanctions.
There is complimentary software on the market capable of recognizing text created by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for discovering generative AI material consist of digital watermarking, content authentication, details retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have often produced false positives, incorrectly accusing students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]
Law and regulation
In the United States, a group of companies consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary contract with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report details to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI models. [104] [105]
In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act includes requirements to divulge copyrighted product used to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]
In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark generated images or videos, policies on training data and label quality, restrictions on individual data collection, and a standard that generative AI should “stick to socialist core values”. [108] [109]
Copyright
Training with copyrighted content
Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, openly available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI designers have argued that such training is safeguarded under reasonable use, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]
Proponents of reasonable usage training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not include making copies of copyrighted works offered to the general public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]
As of 2024, numerous lawsuits related to using copyrighted material in training are ongoing. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]
Copyright of AI-generated material
A different concern is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works created by expert system with no human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they lack human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has actually likewise begun taking public input to figure out if these rules require to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]
Concerns
The advancement of generative AI has raised concerns from governments, companies, and individuals, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, calls to pause AI experiments, and actions by several federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has enormous capacity for good and wicked at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge international development” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, but that its harmful usage “might trigger horrific levels of death and destruction, prevalent trauma, and deep psychological damage on an unthinkable scale”. [118]
Job losses
From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have actually been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems really should be done by them, given the difference between computer systems and people, and in between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually led to 70% of the tasks for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “synthetic intelligence postures an existential risk to creative professions” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]
The intersection of AI and employment concerns amongst underrepresented groups globally remains a critical element. While AI assures efficiency enhancements and skill acquisition, issues about job displacement and biased recruiting procedures continue among these groups, as laid out in surveys by Fast Company. To take advantage of AI for a more equitable society, proactive steps encompass mitigating biases, advocating transparency, appreciating privacy and authorization, and accepting varied groups and ethical factors to consider. Strategies involve rerouting policy focus on regulation, inclusive style, and education’s potential for personalized teaching to make the most of advantages while lessening damages. [126]
Racial and gender bias
Generative AI designs can show and enhance any cultural bias present in the underlying data. For instance, a language design may presume that doctors and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions are common in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “an image of a CEO” might disproportionately generate images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced data set. A variety of methods for alleviating bias have actually been attempted, such as changing input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]
Deepfakes
Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s likeness using synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have amassed widespread attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake celebrity adult videos, revenge porn, fake news, hoaxes, health disinformation, financial fraud, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited responses from both market and federal government to find and limit their use. [140] [141]
In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]
In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (distributed journal technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage”. [144]
Audio deepfakes
Instances of users abusing software application to produce questionable statements in the singing design of stars, public authorities, and other well-known people have actually raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In response, business such as ElevenLabs have actually mentioned that they would deal with mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]
Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The same software utilized to clone voices has been used on well-known musicians’ voices to produce songs that imitate their voices, acquiring both remarkable popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have actually likewise been utilized to develop enhanced quality or full-length variations of songs that have actually been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]
Generative AI has actually likewise been utilized to develop brand-new digital artist personalities, with a few of these getting adequate attention to get record offers at major labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also producing artists which produce unrealistic or immoral appeals to their audiences. [157]
Cybercrime
Generative AI’s capability to develop reasonable fake content has actually been made use of in many kinds of cybercrime, consisting of phishing scams. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been used to develop disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that as soon as deepfake videos end up being perfectly reasonable, they would stop appearing exceptional to viewers, possibly leading to uncritical approval of false info. [159] Additionally, big language designs and other kinds of text-generation AI have actually been used to produce phony evaluations of e-commerce websites to enhance scores. [160] Cybercriminals have produced big language models focused on scams, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]
A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, making it possible for assaulters to get aid with harmful requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their security restrictions at low cost. [163]
Reliance on market giants
Training frontier AI models needs a huge quantity of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech companies have the financial resources to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up buying access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]
Energy and environment
Scientists and journalists have revealed issues about the ecological impact that the advancement and deployment of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big quantities of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these effects might increase as these models are incorporated into extensively utilized search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models need to be re-trained. [170]
Proposed mitigation strategies consist of factoring possible ecological expenses prior to design development or information collection, [165] increasing efficiency of information centers to decrease electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more efficient maker discovering designs, [168] [166] [169] lessening the variety of times that models need to be re-trained, [167] developing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] controling for transparency of these models, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] motivating scientists to release information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject professionals who understand both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]
Content quality
The New York Times specifies slop as analogous to spam: “inferior or unwanted A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search outcomes.” [172] Journalists have revealed issues about the scale of low-quality generated content with regard to social networks material moderation, [173] the financial incentives from social networks business to spread such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific term paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to find greater quality or desired material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of created material by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]
A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a picture of web pages, were device translated. Much of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were equated throughout a minimum of 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]
In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had stopped updating the information for several reasons: high expenses for acquiring information from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other techniques in the natural language processing neighborhood, which “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]
The adoption of generative AI tools led to an explosion of AI-generated content throughout numerous domains. A study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely composed with LLM assistance. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of freshly published computer technology papers and 16.9% of peer review text now include content generated by LLMs. [183]
Visual content follows a comparable trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 34 million images have been created daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these produced by models based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]
If AI-generated material is included in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI designs, flaws in the resulting models might occur. [185] Training an AI model exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each brand-new design is trained on the previous model’s output, causes progressive degradation and ultimately results in a “design collapse” after several iterations. [186] Tests have been conducted with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the worth of information collected from real human interactions with systems may end up being progressively important in the existence of LLM-generated content in information crawled from the Internet.
On the other side, synthetic data is often utilized as an option to information produced by real-world occasions. Such information can be released to confirm mathematical designs and to train maker knowing designs while preserving user personal privacy, [188] including for structured information. [189] The technique is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been used to train computer vision designs. [190]
Misuse in journalism
In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been utilizing a concealed internal AI tool to write a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]
In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a phony AI-generated interview with previous racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public appearances because 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding mishap. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover included the line “deceptively genuine”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly thereafter amidst the controversy. [192]
Other outlets that have published articles whose content and/or byline have been validated or suspected to be developed by generative AI designs – often with false content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – include:
– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]
In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had used generative AI to produce posts for much of the aforementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced tens of countless articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]
News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI models, triggering concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually historically been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content creators or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have actually likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]
In 2023, Google supposedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce newspaper article” based upon input information provided, such as “information of existing occasions”. Some news business executives who saw the pitch described it as” [taking] for given the effort that entered into producing precise and artistic newspaper article.” [224]
In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to write 3 short articles daily utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not need the understanding or authorization of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the published short articles to be identified as being produced or helped by these models. [225]
Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually gone through cybersquatting, with short articles developed by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]
United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed issue that generative AI could have a harmful influence on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies creating a dependence for these news outlets. [235]
Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially more reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]
In reaction to prospective pitfalls around the usage and abuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about declining audience trust, outlets all over the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published standards around how they plan to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]
In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by “mostly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “mainly human with some help from AI”. The outcomes of international surveys reported that people were more uncomfortable with news topics consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]
Computer shows website
Technology portal
Artificial general intelligence – Kind of AI with comprehensive capabilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that simulates conversation
Computational imagination – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing approach
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language design
Large language design – Type of artificial intelligence model
Music and artificial intelligence – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is created algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of information retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in machine knowing
References
^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative designs”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, organizations, and federal governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse right now”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ fight versus AI, people win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Expert System. New York City, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Quick History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted process preparation: the modern survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI organizer based on the HSTS planning framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a standard spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise add an architectural element clearly committed to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are unsupervised multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with without supervision knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some type since ’15. ai’ released in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates plausible pictures of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates 6 kinds of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-a powerful AI design it states can go beyond GPT-4″. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick new AI design – and a smart brand-new way to engage with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and risks of structure designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Investing in Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another significant feature of 15. ai is its rich emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, which consisted of 10,000 “top quality” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s scientists detailed in a paper the ethical challenges that they came across around the advancement of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer sparks argument over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies by means of text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design build times with new AI-driven part production method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as start-up Runway announces new design”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is primary. Runway says it’ll be making its brand-new generative video model, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system innovations such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of business software application … the new A.I. functions, called Copilot, will be available in a few of the business’s most popular service apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function just got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert adventure”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will turn into one of the most essential functions for creative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into design.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and usage Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are produced in your area, so you do not need a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design at home, you will require a computer build with a powerful GPU that can handle the big amount of data and computation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I practically only trust 2 LLM evals today” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to stringent U.S. export requirements that restrict how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 complimentary software to identify phony AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We evaluated a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a big problem for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI content for security, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first guideline on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators elect harder AI guidelines as draft relocate to final stage”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI rules to apply just to items for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise embracing the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Beginning”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what individuals consider AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking computer game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art industry supposedly decimated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of advanced tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring a contract that explicitly demands AI regulations to secure authors and the works they create. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be used to replace labor-has become a crucial sticking point for stars going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently known as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘artificial intelligence postures an existential risk to innovative professions, and all actors and entertainers should have contract language that secures them from having their identity and skill exploited without permission and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the globe are worried about AI being a threat to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language designs are prejudiced. Can logic help save them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the difficulties of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying modern porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech could start an international face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to improve anti-U.S. influence projects, officials state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle against phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the challenges of generative innovations: Proposing the combination of artificial intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has actually begun”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, say experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users accept AI voice clone tool to create celebrity hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI tunes that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ predicts the greatest danger is that deepfakes will eventually end up being dull”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we read online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it implies for climate modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and primarily secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model unexpectedly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, junk … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was manageable and frequently recognizable. Large language models generate text that masquerades as genuine language with intention behind it, although there is none, and their output surface all over,” she wrote. She gives the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dig,” in a way that people do not, which has actually shaken off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the frequency of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI“. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Hazard to A.I. Itself”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered mistakes in more than half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was really AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today site. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian local news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI article about women’s use of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, everything – and nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news websites is publishing AI-written short articles under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter caught utilizing artificial intelligence to develop fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated short articles, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated posts are penetrating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will update AI feature after unreliable news signals”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated presenters to check out the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Turned Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are stunned to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already invading Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators alert AI could cause ‘destruction’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta left news. Now the business’s utilizing it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s technique to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A relative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.