hello@vieclam.jp

987654321

Overview

  • Founded Date 1973年4月19日
  • Sectors Construction / Facilities
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 5
Bottom Promo

Company Description

Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly big language models (LLMs), allowed an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image synthetic intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu as well as many smaller companies have developed generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes throughout a wide variety of markets, consisting of software application advancement, healthcare, financing, home entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and item design. [19] However, concerns have actually been raised about the possible abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, making use of fake news or deepfakes to deceive or control people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Intellectual property law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and replicate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, scientists in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of creating synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these problems have previously been checked out by myth, fiction and philosophy considering that antiquity. [23] The principle of automated art dates back at least to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having created machines capable of writing text, generating noises, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of creative automations has actually thrived throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s robot created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been used to model natural languages considering that their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The academic discipline of artificial intelligence was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced numerous waves of improvement and optimism in the decades since. [31] Expert system research study began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have actually used expert system to develop creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was creating and displaying generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer system program Cohen created to produce paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, especially computer-aided process planning, utilized to create series of actions to reach a specified objective. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems used symbolic AI techniques such as state space search and restraint complete satisfaction and were a “reasonably fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were utilized to produce crisis action strategies for military usage, [35] procedure plans for producing [33] and decision strategies such as in prototype autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of artificial intelligence used both discriminative designs and generative designs, to design and predict information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep learning drove progress and research study in image category, speech recognition, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this era were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks capable of discovering generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for complex data such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not only class labels for images but also entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed improvements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] causing the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), called GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the capability to generalize not being watched to various jobs as a Foundation model. [40]

The new generative designs presented during this period permitted large neural networks to be trained using not being watched learning or semi-supervised learning, rather than the supervised learning typical of discriminative models. Unsupervised knowing removed the requirement for human beings to by hand identify data, enabling larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that might generate persuading character voices using very little training data. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content development, affecting subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the development of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to top quality synthetic intelligence art creation from natural language triggers. [46] These systems demonstrated unprecedented abilities in generating photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based on text descriptions, leading to widespread adoption among artists, designers, and the general public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT changed the availability and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s capability to take part in natural discussions, generate creative content, assist with coding, and perform different analytical jobs captured global attention and triggered widespread discussion about AI’s potential influence on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another dive in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might fairly be deemed an early (yet still insufficient) variation of a synthetic general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who maintained that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the standard of ‘general human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI design integrating numerous methods including text, images, video, thermal data, 3D information, audio, and motion, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI model offered in 4 variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed strategies for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, releasing a mobile app on Android and integrating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 household of big language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs showed considerable improvements in capabilities throughout various benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus notably exceeding leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed improved performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become an international leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants utilizing the technology, exceeding both the international average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is more evidenced by China’s intellectual residential or commercial property advancements in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly exceeding the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using not being watched artificial intelligence (invoking for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine learning trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend on the method or kind of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language models). They can natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be used as foundation models for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language designs can be trained on programs language text, enabling them to generate source code for new computer programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing high-quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly utilized for text-to-image generation and neural design transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can also be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which showed the capability to clone character voices using as little as 15 seconds of training data. [67] The site acquired extensive attention for its ability to produce emotionally expressive speech for various fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music along with text annotations, in order to produce new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been created, like the tune Savages, which used AI to simulate rap artist Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists must get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been produced that can be generated using a text expression, genre choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can generate temporally-coherent, comprehensive and photorealistic video clips. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the motions of a robotic system to generate new trajectories for movement planning or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “pick up blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to manage movements of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can perform fundamental reasoning in response to user triggers and visual input, such as choosing up a toy dinosaur when provided the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other objects. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided design (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be established using connected open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to help streamline workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are used to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have actually been integrated into a range of existing commercially readily available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are also available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI designs with up to a few billion parameters can operate on smartphones, embedded devices, and computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion parameters) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with 10s of billions of criteria can run on laptop computer or home computer. To accomplish an acceptable speed, models of this size may require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion specification version of LLaMA can be set up to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI in your area consist of security of privacy and intellectual home, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular concentrates on utilizing consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That online forum is among just two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has actually promoted open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI safety. [95]

Language models with hundreds of billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, generally operate on computer systems geared up with ranges of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are usually accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed limitations on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.

There is totally free software application on the market efficient in acknowledging text created by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation methods for detecting generative AI content consist of digital watermarking, content authentication, information retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of precision, both free and paid AI text detectors have actually regularly produced incorrect positives, erroneously accusing students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and regulation

In the United States, a group of companies consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary contract with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to require all US business to report info to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to disclose copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark produced images or videos, guidelines on training information and label quality, restrictions on individual data collection, and a standard that generative AI must “adhere to socialist core worths”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted material

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, openly available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have actually argued that such training is protected under reasonable use, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have actually argued that it is a transformative usage and does not include making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs compete with the content they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of lawsuits associated with the usage of copyrighted material in training are continuous. Getty Images has sued Stability AI over making use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually sued Microsoft and OpenAI over using their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can receive copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works produced by synthetic intelligence without any human input can not be copyrighted, since they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has actually also started taking public input to identify if these guidelines need to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, businesses, and individuals, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, calls to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by multiple governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has massive potential for excellent and evil at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge international development” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the worldwide economy by 2030, however that its malicious use “could cause dreadful levels of death and destruction, prevalent trauma, and deep psychological damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have been arguments advanced by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems really ought to be done by them, given the difference in between computer systems and human beings, and in between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has led to 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “expert system poses an existential hazard to imaginative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a prospective obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and employment issues amongst underrepresented groups globally stays a crucial element. While AI promises efficiency enhancements and ability acquisition, issues about task displacement and prejudiced recruiting processes persist among these groups, as outlined in studies by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more fair society, proactive steps encompass mitigating predispositions, promoting openness, respecting privacy and approval, and welcoming varied groups and ethical considerations. Strategies include redirecting policy emphasis on regulation, inclusive style, and education’s capacity for tailored mentor to maximize advantages while lessening damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI models can reflect and magnify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For instance, a language design might assume that physicians and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases prevail in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image model triggered with the text “a photo of a CEO” might disproportionately generate pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased data set. A number of methods for reducing predisposition have actually been tried, such as modifying input prompts [129] and reweighting training data. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s similarity using artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually amassed extensive attention and issues for their usages in deepfake celebrity pornographic videos, vengeance pornography, phony news, hoaxes, health disinformation, financial fraud, and covert foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited reactions from both market and federal government to identify and limit their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically discovered that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed journal technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to produce questionable declarations in the vocal design of celebrities, public authorities, and other well-known people have actually raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, business such as ElevenLabs have mentioned that they would work on mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have spawned from AI-generated music. The exact same software utilized to clone voices has actually been utilized on famous artists’ voices to produce songs that imitate their voices, gaining both tremendous appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have likewise been used to produce better quality or full-length versions of songs that have actually been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has likewise been utilized to produce new digital artist characters, with a few of these getting enough attention to receive record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise developing artists which develop unrealistic or immoral appeals to their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to develop reasonable fake material has actually been made use of in many kinds of cybercrime, including phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been utilized to produce disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that as soon as deepfake videos become perfectly realistic, they would stop appearing exceptional to viewers, possibly causing uncritical approval of false details. [159] Additionally, large language models and other kinds of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to produce fake evaluations of e-commerce sites to enhance rankings. [160] Cybercriminals have actually developed large language designs concentrated on scams, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, making it possible for opponents to get assist with harmful requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have actually shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their safety constraints at low cost. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models requires a massive quantity of calculating power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the funds to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have actually expressed concerns about the environmental effect that the advancement and implementation of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater utilized for information centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical energy use. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these impacts might increase as these designs are incorporated into widely utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs require to be retrained. [170]

Proposed mitigation strategies include factoring potential environmental costs prior to model advancement or information collection, [165] increasing efficiency of data centers to reduce electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more effective maker finding out designs, [168] [166] [169] minimizing the number of times that models require to be retrained, [167] establishing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological effect of these models, [168] [167] managing for openness of these models, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] motivating researchers to publish information on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject professionals who understand both maker knowing and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times defines slop as analogous to spam: “substandard or unwanted A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have actually expressed concerns about the scale of low-grade created content with respect to social networks content moderation, [173] the financial incentives from social networks companies to spread such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical term paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover greater quality or wanted material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated material by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a picture of web pages, were maker translated. Many of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, especially for sentences that were equated throughout a minimum of 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that computed word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had actually stopped updating the data for several factors: high costs for getting information from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other techniques in the natural language processing community, and that “generative AI has contaminated the information”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools led to a surge of AI-generated content throughout numerous domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely written with LLM help. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of recently published computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer review text now include content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a comparable pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have actually been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these developed by designs based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI designs, problems in the resulting designs may occur. [185] Training an AI design specifically on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this process, where each new model is trained on the previous model’s output, causes progressive destruction and eventually results in a “design collapse” after several models. [186] Tests have actually been performed with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the value of data collected from genuine human interactions with systems may become increasingly valuable in the existence of LLM-generated material in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial data is typically used as an alternative to information produced by real-world occasions. Such information can be deployed to verify mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence models while preserving user personal privacy, [188] including for structured information. [189] The method is not limited to text generation; image generation has actually been utilized to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been using a concealed internal AI tool to write a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with former racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing mishap. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “deceptively real”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon afterwards amid the controversy. [192]

Other outlets that have released short articles whose content and/or byline have been verified or believed to be developed by generative AI designs – often with false material, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually used generative AI to produce articles for numerous of the abovementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had actually produced 10s of countless short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, prompting concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually historically been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content developers or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have actually likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google reportedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce news stories” based on input information provided, such as “details of current occasions”. Some news business executives who saw the pitch explained it as” [taking] for given the effort that went into producing precise and artful newspaper article.” [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay little publishers to write 3 short articles each day using a beta generative AI design. The program does not need the knowledge or consent of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the released articles to be labeled as being produced or assisted by these models. [225]

Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have undergone cybersquatting, with posts produced by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have revealed concern that generative AI might have a damaging impact on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund regional news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies creating a reliance for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes newspaper article, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially further decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In reaction to potential mistakes around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over declining audience trust, outlets all over the world, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have released guidelines around how they prepare to use and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “mostly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “primarily human with some assistance from AI”. The results of international surveys reported that people were more uncomfortable with news subjects including politics (46%), criminal offense (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programming website

Technology portal

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with wide-ranging abilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media produced with AI
Artificial life – Field of research study
Chatbot – Program that mimics discussion
Computational imagination – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of big language model
Large language design – Kind of artificial intelligence model
Music and expert system – Usage of artificial intelligence to generate music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is created algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of information retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories heats up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, organizations, and governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse simply yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ fight against AI, human beings win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems clash with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided procedure preparation: the modern survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI planner based on the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a traditional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also add an architectural element clearly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Detailed Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are without supervision multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with unsupervised knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some form considering that ’15. ai’ launched in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces possible images of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace human beings?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that combines 6 types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-an effective AI model it says can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, going beyond GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a fast brand-new AI model – and a smart brand-new way to connect with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4″. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Live.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and dangers of foundation models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Investing in Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another major feature of 15. ai is its rich emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, which included 10,000 “high-quality” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers outlined in a paper the ethical challenges that they came across around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer triggers dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design develop times with new AI-driven part production approach|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway announces brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is primary. Runway states it’ll be making its brand-new generative video design, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software … the new A.I. functions, dubbed Copilot, will be available in a few of the business’s most popular organization apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a big upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll have the ability to utilize generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will turn into one of the most crucial features for innovative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and usage Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you desire to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or modify the code, you can download it directly from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created in your area, so you don’t require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in your home, you will require a computer build with a powerful GPU that can deal with the large amount of information and calculation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with stringent U.S. export standards that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 free software application to acknowledge phony AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We tested a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for instructors. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be difficult. That’s a huge problem for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for safety, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first policy on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers vote for harder AI guidelines as draft transfer to final stage”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI rules to apply just to items for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also embracing the technology”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Going”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what people think of AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking video game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art market supposedly annihilated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of advanced tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring an agreement that clearly requires AI guidelines to secure writers and the works they create. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be used to replace labor-has end up being a crucial sticking point for stars going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently known as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system presents an existential risk to creative occupations, and all actors and performers are worthy of contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and skill made use of without approval and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in nations worldwide are stressed over AI being a risk to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are prejudiced. Can logic assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and enhancing security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 showed the obstacles of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying high-tech pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the increase”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech could start a global showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to increase anti-U.S. influence projects, authorities say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative innovations: Proposing the integration of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has actually started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, state professionals”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users accept AI voice clone tool to generate celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record offer with AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘fraud czar’ anticipates the greatest threat is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being dull”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake evaluations: can we trust what we read online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it means for environment modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and mainly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We’ve Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design unexpectedly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and often recognizable. Large language designs generate text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, although there is none, and their output surface all over,” she wrote. She offers the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word “dig,” in a method that individuals do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the occurrence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively created data”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Threat to A.I. Itself”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in more than half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was in fact AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Transfer To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, In Addition To Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI short article about females’s use of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a fixture in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of local news sites is publishing AI-written posts under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured utilizing artificial intelligence to develop fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are permeating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will update AI feature after unreliable news informs”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are using AI-generated speakers to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Precious Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are stunned to find their name and work have actually been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI could lead to ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta ignored news. Now the company’s using it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s technique to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Bottom Promo
Bottom Promo
Top Promo